Skip to content
METRIC OAK

New: the 3-week Data Platform Assessment: fixed fee, priced roadmap. See what's included →

Comparison

SageMaker vs Databricks: which platform for data and machine learning on AWS?

Amazon SageMaker and Databricks compared for machine learning and data on AWS: SageMaker AI versus the next-generation SageMaker with Unified Studio, the lakehouse and table formats, MLOps, governance, multi-cloud, cost and when each fits.

Hemant Walchale

Hemant Walchale
· 3 min read

“SageMaker vs Databricks” means two different questions, because the SageMaker name changed. SageMaker AI is AWS’s managed machine learning service. The next-generation SageMaker, announced at the end of 2024, is a wider data and AI platform; its SageMaker Unified Studio became generally available in March 2025. Decide which comparison you are making first.

The short answer

  • Choose Databricks if you want one consolidated platform for data engineering, SQL analytics and machine learning, with Unity Catalog governance, Spark and Delta at its core, and the option to run on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud.
  • Choose SageMaker if you are committed to AWS and want to assemble the platform from AWS services (Glue, EMR, Athena, Redshift, Bedrock, SageMaker AI) under one studio, with AWS identity and billing throughout.
  • Use both when Databricks is your data platform but a team already serves models on SageMaker AI, or wants specific AWS ML features.

How they compare

Databricks Amazon SageMaker
What it is One lakehouse platform for data, analytics and AI A family of AWS services under one studio
Clouds AWS, Azure, Google Cloud AWS
Data engineering Spark, Lakeflow pipelines and jobs AWS Glue, Amazon EMR
SQL analytics Databricks SQL warehouses Amazon Athena, Amazon Redshift
Table format Delta Lake, with Iceberg interoperability Apache Iceberg in SageMaker Lakehouse
Governance Unity Catalog SageMaker Catalog, AWS Lake Formation, IAM
Model training Notebooks, Spark, GPU clusters, serverless GPU SageMaker AI training jobs, HyperPod
Experiment tracking Managed MLflow Managed MLflow in SageMaker AI, SageMaker Experiments
Model serving Model Serving endpoints SageMaker AI endpoints
Generative AI Foundation model APIs, Agent Bricks, vector search Amazon Bedrock
Pricing model DBUs plus your cloud compute Per service: instance hours, queries, storage

What usually decides it

  1. Single cloud or several. Databricks runs the same way on all three major clouds. SageMaker is AWS only.
  2. One platform or best-of-breed services. Databricks is more consolidated; SageMaker gives more service-level choice and deeper AWS integration, with more pieces to configure.
  3. Where your data engineering lives. If heavy ETL and Spark already run on Databricks, keeping ML next to the data avoids copies. If data lives in Redshift and Glue, SageMaker keeps you inside that estate.
  4. Governance. Unity Catalog covers tables, files, models and features in one place. On AWS, governance spans SageMaker Catalog, Lake Formation and IAM.
  5. Skills. Teams fluent in AWS services move quickly in SageMaker; Spark and SQL teams move quickly in Databricks.

Cost

Neither is cheaper by default. Idle clusters and endpoints, oversized instances and copying data between services drive most of the bill on both. See our data platform FinOps guide and Databricks cluster policies for the controls that matter.

The short version

Databricks for one multi-cloud platform covering data and ML with unified governance; SageMaker for an AWS-native estate built from AWS services. Many organisations run both, with open table formats on S3 and MLflow in common.

Related: Databricks vs BigQuery, MLflow vs Kubeflow and what is Unity Catalog. Our AI-ready data service prepares data platforms for machine learning.

Sources

Further reading from other practitioners

Not sure where your own platform stands? Take the free 3-minute data platform scorecard, or see how we work on Databricks. Unfamiliar terms are explained in the data engineering glossary.

Frequently asked questions

Is SageMaker a competitor to Databricks?

It depends which SageMaker. SageMaker AI is AWS's managed machine learning service for training, tuning and serving models, so it overlaps with Databricks' ML features. Since 2025, the SageMaker name also covers a broader data and AI platform, with SageMaker Unified Studio bringing together EMR, Glue, Athena, Redshift, Bedrock and SageMaker AI, which competes with Databricks as a whole.

Can Databricks and SageMaker be used together?

Yes. A common pattern is to prepare data and features in Databricks and train or host some models in SageMaker AI, or the reverse. Both read open table formats on S3, and MLflow is available as a managed service on both.

Which is cheaper?

There is no general answer. Total cost depends on workload design, idle compute, data movement and how well each platform is governed more than on list prices. Compare on a representative workload with your own discounts.

Have 30 minutes? Get a senior architect’s view of your data platform.

No sales deck. You talk to the engineer who would lead the work.

Book an architecture review